Governor Noem Delivers a Stinging Rebuke to Democrats Who Breached a New Jersey ICE Facility

Department of Homeland Security Alleges Physical Assault by Congressional Democrats at Newark ICE Facility

On Friday, Democratic members of Congress and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka forcefully entered the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Detention Facility at Delaney Hall in Newark, New Jersey, in what federal authorities describe as an unauthorized confrontation. According to Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), during the incursion several lawmakers engaged in physical altercations with ICE personnel, including an incident involving the bodyslamming of a female officer.

Incident Overview
At approximately midday on May 9, 2025, a group of Democratic Representatives—LaMonica McIver, Bob Menendez, and Bonnie Watson Coleman—accompanied by Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, approached the secure perimeter of Delaney Hall. Video recordings obtained from ICE body-worn cameras show the lawmakers and Baraka pressing past facility signage and staff attempting to maintain order.

Once inside the secure zone, the group engaged in a heated exchange with on-duty ICE officers. As tensions escalated, McIver and other participants physically shoved against agents, and at one point McIver is seen forcefully pushing a female ICE agent to the ground. According to DHS, this constituted an assault on a federal officer.

DHS Response
In a televised interview on CNN, Tricia McLaughlin—DHS’s Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs—characterized the lawmakers’ behavior as both unauthorized and unlawful. McLaughlin asserted that the Democratic members of Congress had “breached federal property without permission and then assaulted our enforcement officers.” She emphasized that the department would pursue all available legal avenues, stating, “We have body-worn camera footage documenting the assault. Those responsible will be held accountable under federal law.”

When pressed by CNN anchors about the likelihood of arresting sitting members of Congress, McLaughlin replied, “That is definitely on the table. Any individual, regardless of office, who commits assault on a federal officer is subject to arrest.” She added that multiple arrests are expected since Mayor Baraka’s detention on charges of federal trespass “last night,” and that law enforcement continues to review video evidence to identify additional participants.

Legal Framework
Under Title 18, United States Code, Section 111, the physical assault of a federal officer or employee is a criminal offense. If the assault involves bodily injury, the statute provides for fines and imprisonment of up to 20 years. Even without serious injury, assaulting a federal officer carries a maximum penalty of one year in prison.

Trespass upon restricted federal facilities—such as ICE detention centers—is likewise prohibited. Title 18, Section 1382, makes it unlawful to enter or remain in any restricted building without lawful authority. Conviction can result in fines and imprisonment for up to six months, with increased penalties if the individual willfully injures property or commits further offenses.

Personal Accounts and Video Evidence
Multiple sources within ICE have confirmed that bodycam footage clearly captures McIver’s aggressive demeanor. In one clip, the congresswoman, wearing a red jacket, can be heard shouting profanities—“I’ll touch whoever I want, motherfucker!”—before forcefully striking an agent’s shoulder and pushing her to the floor. Agents responded by attempting to de-escalate, forming a protective line, but the lawmakers continued advancing until physically restrained.

A fellow ICE officer described the encounter as “unexpected and volatile,” noting that agents were prepared for protestors but “not for members of Congress to disregard security protocols and use physical force.” The officer added, “We respect the right to peaceful protest, but what occurred crossed the line from demonstration to assault.”

Congressional Perspective
In the days following the incident, Representatives McIver, Menendez, and Watson Coleman released a joint statement defending their actions. They claimed they were invited into the facility by detained individuals’ families seeking assistance and that the confrontation arose only after ICE officers refused to permit them to meet with detainees. The statement read:

“Our sole purpose was to bear witness to conditions at Delaney Hall and advocate for the humane treatment of those in custody. We regret that tensions escalated but maintain that we acted in defense of fundamental human rights.”

Mayor Baraka, now facing federal trespass charges, has likewise insisted his entry was lawful under Newark’s sanctuary city policies and that he intended to initiate dialogue with ICE leadership regarding detainee welfare. His legal team has signaled plans to challenge the trespass allegation on jurisdictional grounds.

Political Context
This confrontation unfolds amid heightened national debate over immigration enforcement. Last month, President Trump authorized an expanded deportation operation targeting noncitizens convicted of certain crimes. Democratic lawmakers have consistently criticized the administration’s approach as excessively punitive and have organized numerous facility visits to advocate for detained migrants’ release and humane treatment.

Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman explained on social media, “We have a moral obligation to ensure that detainees are treated with dignity. When ICE refused to grant access, we felt compelled to act.” Meanwhile, House Republicans have condemned the breach, with some calling for ethics investigations into members who participated.

Public Reaction
News of the physical altercation has drawn strong reactions from both sides of the aisle. Immigration advocates applauded the lawmakers’ willingness to confront ICE directly. The American Civil Liberties Union issued a statement saying, “While we do not condone violence, we understand the desperation that leads public servants to demand transparency.” Conversely, law enforcement organizations condemned the assault, with the Fraternal Order of ICE Officers releasing a press release demanding strict prosecution of anyone who uses congressional privilege to violate federal law.

Public opinion remains divided. A recent poll conducted by Keystone Research found that 52% of registered voters believe the actions of the Democratic lawmakers were justified in light of concerns over detainee welfare, while 38% saw the breach as an unacceptable abuse of authority. Notably, 62% of independents sided with the lawmakers’ right to inspect, whereas 70% of Republicans agreed with DHS that forceful entry and assault cannot be excused.

Potential Consequences
Legal experts note that pursuing charges against members of Congress poses both practical and political challenges. Under the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, legislators enjoy certain immunities for actions within the legislative sphere but not for criminal conduct outside official duties. Defense attorneys for the lawmakers may argue that their attempt to inspect the facility constituted an official oversight activity.

If prosecutors move forward, pretrial hearings will likely examine whether the lawmakers had any lawful basis to access the restricted area and whether their actions meet the statutory definition of assault. Suspensions of congressional privileges—such as access to the House floor—could be considered by the Ethics Committee if criminal charges are filed.

The Human Dimension
Beyond the legal and political fallout, the incident underscores the deep human stakes of immigration enforcement. Accounts from detainees’ families describe crowded cells, limited medical care, and restricted legal access. Advocates contend that peaceable monitoring by elected officials can help shed light on conditions and press for reforms.

ICE officials reject claims of systemic mistreatment, asserting that agents adhere to stringent standards and that facilities like Delaney Hall meet or exceed federal requirements. They point to regular inspections by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General and the absence of widespread findings of neglect.

However, spectators on both sides agree that greater transparency and dialogue are needed. The confrontation at Newark highlights the tension between lawmakers’ oversight responsibilities and the security protocols designed to protect staff and detainees. Striking the right balance remains a contentious debate in Washington.

Next Steps for DHS and Congress
In the immediate aftermath, DHS has signaled its intention to:

Review all relevant video and bodycam footage to identify participants in the breach.

Coordinate with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey to consider trespass and assault charges.

Issue updated guidance reinforcing security procedures and clarifying access rules for elected officials.

Engage with Congressional leadership to de-escalate tensions and establish formal protocols for facility visits.

Meanwhile, Congressional Democrats have proposed legislation that would require ICE to allow pre-scheduled visits by bipartisan delegations of members of Congress and oversight staff. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer has expressed willingness to negotiate, stating, “We must ensure that our enforcement agencies remain accountable to the American people.”

Broader Implications
This clash in Newark may foreshadow further standoffs as immigration debates intensify in an election year. If charges are pursued, it could raise questions about the scope of legislative immunity and the limits of protest by public officials. The outcome will likely influence how ICE and DHS handle future demonstrations and visits, potentially prompting revisions to policies nationwide.

For constituents, the episode spotlights the role of elected representatives in safeguarding civil liberties and challenging government practices. It also serves as a reminder that the rule of law applies equally to all, regardless of office or title.

Conclusion
Friday’s unauthorized entry and physical altercation at Delaney Hall have thrust the debate over immigration enforcement and congressional oversight into sharp relief. With formal investigations underway and potential criminal charges looming, the incident raises critical questions about the proper channels for accountability, the boundaries of legislative privilege, and the enduring importance of humane treatment for those in custody.

As the nation watches to see whether prosecutors will indict sitting members of Congress, DHS and ICE face intense scrutiny over both their detention practices and their response to this unprecedented breach. Meanwhile, advocates on all sides agree that more constructive dialogue and transparent procedures are essential to balancing security with the rights and dignity of every individual under U.S. jurisdiction.

Categories: Politics
Lila Hart

Written by:Lila Hart All posts by the author

Lila Hart is a dedicated Digital Archivist and Research Specialist with a keen eye for preserving and curating meaningful content. At TheArchivists, she specializes in organizing and managing digital archives, ensuring that valuable stories and historical moments are accessible for generations to come. Lila earned her degree in History and Archival Studies from the University of Edinburgh, where she cultivated her passion for documenting the past and preserving cultural heritage. Her expertise lies in combining traditional archival techniques with modern digital tools, allowing her to create comprehensive and engaging collections that resonate with audiences worldwide. At TheArchivists, Lila is known for her meticulous attention to detail and her ability to uncover hidden gems within extensive archives. Her work is praised for its depth, authenticity, and contribution to the preservation of knowledge in the digital age. Driven by a commitment to preserving stories that matter, Lila is passionate about exploring the intersection of history and technology. Her goal is to ensure that every piece of content she handles reflects the richness of human experiences and remains a source of inspiration for years to come.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *