Soros Money Behind the Streets Again
The massive wave of “No Kings” protests scheduled to erupt across the country this weekend — demonstrations that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer himself plans to join — are not as grassroots as they appear.
According to new disclosures and archived grant records, these rallies are being bankrolled by billionaire George Soros’ extensive funding network, through layers of progressive organizations tied directly to his Open Society Foundations (OSF).
Soros, one of the Democratic Party’s most powerful financiers, has poured tens of billions into reshaping the political landscape under the banner of “open and democratic societies.” But critics say that beneath the polished slogans lies something darker: a coordinated machine for funding protest movements, political activism, and ideological disruption — all while maintaining the veneer of independence.
Now, newly surfaced data show Soros’ money fueling the very infrastructure behind the “No Kings” movement — a campaign marketed as spontaneous outrage against President Trump’s wartime authority but organized through Indivisible, a longtime Soros grantee.
The $3 Million Trail
At the center of this network is Indivisible, a progressive activist group founded in 2017 as part of the “Resistance” to Trump’s first term.
Public filings reveal that in 2023, the Open Society Action Fund, a key political arm of Soros’ foundation, issued a two-year $3 million grant to Indivisible to support its “social welfare activities.”
Fast forward to 2025 — Indivisible is now managing participant data, communications, and logistics for the “No Kings” protests, both in Washington, D.C., and in dozens of other U.S. cities.
In short: Soros’ money helped build the machine now mobilizing against the Trump administration’s Middle East peace plan and its subsequent expansion of executive authority.
And this isn’t the first time. Records show Soros’ network has funneled at least $7.6 million to Indivisible since its formation, through both direct grants and partner organizations like the Tides Network.
The Soros–Indivisible Nexus
The connections between Soros’ Open Society Foundations and Indivisible are not incidental — they are structural.
Indivisible’s executive co-director Leah Greenberg once served as policy director for Tom Perriello, a former Democratic congressman who later became executive director of the Open Society Foundations from 2018 through 2023.
That means the same network funding Indivisible was once run by Greenberg’s former boss — a neat circle of influence between political operatives and philanthropic capital.
Indivisible’s co-founder Ezra Levin, Greenberg’s husband, has frequently echoed Soros’ talking points about “transforming democracy” and “resisting authoritarianism.”
The Tides Foundation — another Soros-aligned nonprofit umbrella — also contributed $350,000 to Indivisible in its early days. The Tides Network has been criticized repeatedly for channeling money to anti-Israel and far-left activist groups, many of which have been linked to unrest on U.S. campuses and in major cities.
“No Kings” — and No Transparency
The “No Kings” branding — a rallying cry meant to protest Trump’s consolidation of executive power after the Israel–Hamas peace deal — has drawn tens of thousands of sign-ups.
But while the movement bills itself as “grassroots,” it operates more like a well-oiled political campaign, complete with professional marketing, social media coordination, and data collection — all trademarks of Soros-backed organizing.
According to insiders, Indivisible has been responsible for compiling participant lists, coordinating event materials, and managing messaging platforms used to synchronize protest slogans across multiple cities.
That’s not activism — that’s astroturfing.
The Open Society Defense
In response to inquiries from Fox News Digital, the Open Society Foundations issued a familiar statement:
“We support a wide range of independent organizations that work to deepen civic engagement through peaceful democratic participation, a hallmark of any vibrant society and a right protected by the Constitution. Our grantees make their own decisions about their work, consistent with the law and the terms of their grant agreements.”
It’s the same line Soros’ network has used for years — one that technically acknowledges the money trail while denying any operational control.
But critics say that’s a convenient legal dodge. Once the money lands, it doesn’t matter whether OSF writes the script — the grants enable and sustain the activism regardless.
Cruz Sounds the Alarm
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) was among the first to publicly connect the dots. In a Thursday interview with Sean Hannity, Cruz warned that the “No Kings” protests could escalate into riots — similar to those seen in 2020.
“There’s considerable evidence that George Soros and his network are behind funding these rallies, which may well be riots all across the country,” Cruz said.
He cited his proposed STOP FUNDERs Act — short for “Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots.”
The bill, introduced in July, would authorize the Department of Justice to use RICO statutes — traditionally used against organized crime — to prosecute individuals or organizations that knowingly fund violent protests.
“This politicized march is being organized by Soros operatives and funded by Soros money. No one denies these basic facts,” Cruz added. “The Trump administration and the Republican Congress are committed to countering this network of left-wing violence.”
“Peaceful” Protests with a Familiar Edge
For its part, Indivisible insists the demonstrations are strictly peaceful. Its official “Protest Guide” reads:
“Protests are most effective when we peacefully use our constitutionally protected rights of assembly and speech and properly prepare ahead of time.”
The Open Society Foundations similarly stressed that it “opposes all forms of violence, including violent protests.”
But history suggests otherwise: many “peaceful” movements financed or supported by Soros-linked organizations have a pattern of devolving into chaos once the cameras roll — from anti-police marches to the riots that tore through American cities in 2020.
As one congressional aide put it, “When Soros dollars start moving, unrest isn’t far behind.”
Calls for Investigation
Republican lawmakers are now demanding a federal probe into the Soros funding pipeline.
Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging immediate investigation into both the Open Society Foundations and other Soros-backed fronts.
“The funding of organizations that engage in, support, or incite political violence must not be tolerated,” Carter wrote.
He cited findings that Soros’ network distributed more than $80 million to groups accused of endorsing or participating in domestic extremism since 2020.
So far, the DOJ has not commented on whether it plans to investigate.
The Pattern: Global Money, Domestic Division
Soros’ defenders claim his philanthropy is about democracy. But his critics say his track record tells a different story — one of destabilization disguised as reform.
From Eastern Europe’s color revolutions to U.S. racial justice uprisings, Soros’ money appears wherever ideological fires need fueling. The “No Kings” movement is just the latest manifestation of that global playbook: foment public unrest, weaken traditional institutions, and consolidate political power under the guise of equality and justice.
And once again, the same fingerprints are visible — the same organizations, the same funding patterns, the same media chorus rushing to sanitize it all.
Conclusion: Follow the Money
As tens of thousands prepare to flood the streets of D.C. and beyond this weekend, the question isn’t whether George Soros’ network is involved — it’s how deep that involvement goes.
With millions in grants, decades of activist infrastructure, and a growing web of ideological allies embedded across the American left, Soros doesn’t need to command protests directly.
He simply funds the system that ensures they happen.
And while he claims to support “open societies,” the result is always the same: closed minds, fractured communities, and chaos dressed up as democracy.
Ethan Blake is a skilled Creative Content Specialist with a talent for crafting engaging and thought-provoking narratives. With a strong background in storytelling and digital content creation, Ethan brings a unique perspective to his role at TheArchivists, where he curates and produces captivating content for a global audience.
Ethan holds a degree in Communications from Zurich University, where he developed his expertise in storytelling, media strategy, and audience engagement. Known for his ability to blend creativity with analytical precision, he excels at creating content that not only entertains but also connects deeply with readers.
At TheArchivists, Ethan specializes in uncovering compelling stories that reflect a wide range of human experiences. His work is celebrated for its authenticity, creativity, and ability to spark meaningful conversations, earning him recognition among peers and readers alike.
Passionate about the art of storytelling, Ethan enjoys exploring themes of culture, history, and personal growth, aiming to inspire and inform with every piece he creates. Dedicated to making a lasting impact, Ethan continues to push boundaries in the ever-evolving world of digital content.