The Return of Jen Psaki: A Relic From the Biden Years
Of all the figures to re-emerge from the political dustbin of the Biden era, Jen Psaki has to be one of the least missed. After two years of deflecting, gaslighting, and sanctimonious “circling back” at the White House podium, Psaki had quietly settled into the liberal comfort zone of cable news punditry and podcast chatter. But like a ghost who refuses to stay buried, she resurfaced this week with a comment so absurd it’s almost impossible to believe she said it out loud.
During an appearance on the wildly overrated podcast I’ve Had It, Psaki decided to take a swing at someone who’s not even an elected official — Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President J.D. Vance.
Her take? That Usha, one of the most accomplished women in the country, is a “Stepford wife.”
You read that right. The same Jen Psaki who used to lecture America about “respecting women’s choices” has now decided that a successful, self-made attorney — who happens to be married to a conservative man — must be brainwashed or oppressed.
It’s the kind of lazy, smug insult that says far more about the person making it than the target.
The ‘I’ve Had It’ Echo Chamber
For anyone lucky enough not to have encountered I’ve Had It, imagine The View after three glasses of pinot grigio and a semester of gender studies. It’s a podcast built entirely on the conceit of being snarky about conservatives — a safe space for affluent white female liberals (or “AWFLs,” as Psaki’s critics accurately label them) to indulge in performative outrage while convincing themselves they’re brave truth-tellers.
Psaki fit right in.
The former press secretary’s appearance was dripping with the kind of condescension that has become the left’s trademark tone whenever they talk about women who don’t share their politics. She painted Usha Vance — who has accomplished more in her career than most of Psaki’s media peers combined — as a passive ornament in her husband’s political story.
To them, there’s no other possible explanation: a woman married to a strong conservative man must be oppressed.
But here’s the problem — that narrative collapses under the weight of Usha Vance’s own résumé.
The Real Usha Vance: Powerhouse, Not Prop
Before she was the Vice President’s wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance was already a legal heavyweight. She graduated from Yale Law School, clerked for three federal judges — including Chief Justice John Roberts — and worked as a litigation partner at one of the most prestigious law firms in the United States. She was, by all accounts, the kind of woman young attorneys dream of becoming: sharp, disciplined, and utterly fearless.
She didn’t ride anyone’s coattails. She built her career brick by brick, long before her husband ever ran for office.
By contrast, Jen Psaki’s résumé reads like a crash course in opportunistic politics — bouncing from Democratic communications jobs to the Obama White House, to MSNBC, and now to the talk-show circuit. Psaki’s entire career depends on narrative, not merit.
And that’s what makes her attack on Usha Vance so galling.
Because the truth is, Usha represents everything the modern left pretends to celebrate: a first-generation success story, the daughter of Indian immigrants who worked their way into the American dream through grit and education. Yet the moment she refuses to conform to liberal orthodoxy, her achievements magically disappear. Suddenly, she’s just “the wife.”
The Hypocrisy of ‘Feminism’ on the Left
It’s impossible to ignore the glaring hypocrisy here. Democrats constantly preach about empowering women — as long as those women vote blue, recite the right slogans, and despise traditional family structures.
But when a woman succeeds on her own terms, values marriage and family, and supports a conservative man, she becomes a target.
This is the twisted logic of modern left-wing feminism: women are “empowered” only if they conform. The moment they deviate, they’re labeled as traitors to their gender or, in Psaki’s words, “Stepford wives.”
The irony, of course, is that the original Stepford Wives story was a satire about men controlling women — yet here, it’s the Democratic establishment trying to dictate what kind of woman is acceptable.
Usha Vance, a practicing Hindu who built an elite legal career and now serves as an influential adviser to her husband, doesn’t fit that box. She’s not angry enough, not bitter enough, and certainly not dependent on victimhood to define her identity.
That makes her dangerous to the left’s narrative — and that’s why Psaki and her ilk are lashing out.
From White House Podium to Gossip Podcast
It’s telling that Psaki’s big re-entry into political discourse happened not through a policy debate, not through serious journalism, but through idle gossip.
That’s what the left’s intellectual class has become — a feedback loop of self-congratulating cynicism. The same pundits who spent four years calling Melania Trump a “Russian prop” or Kayleigh McEnany a “blonde mouthpiece” are now recycling the same sexist tropes for Usha Vance.
Psaki’s remarks aren’t just an insult to the Vice President’s wife — they’re a window into the Democratic psyche.
This is a party that cannot function without enemies. They need villains to justify their identity politics, and when they run out of male targets, they turn on conservative women.
The Democrats’ Obsession With the Vances
The reason Jen Psaki and her fellow travelers are fixated on the Vances is simple: they terrify them.
J.D. Vance has emerged as the heir apparent to the America First movement, a figure who blends Trump’s populist instincts with intellectual rigor and moral conviction. He’s not a career politician; he’s a Marine veteran, a venture capitalist, and a best-selling author who speaks fluently about working-class struggles because he lived them.
And then there’s Usha — the perfect counterbalance. Elegant, articulate, and grounded. She’s the rare political spouse who elevates her husband’s credibility rather than serving as window dressing.
Together, they project exactly what Democrats fear most: competence, unity, and faith.
They represent the antidote to everything the modern left has become — a healthy, patriotic, traditional family that refuses to apologize for success or faith.
That’s why the attacks have escalated. It’s not about Usha personally; it’s about what she symbolizes.
Why Usha Vance Breaks Their Script
For years, Democrats have crafted a simple story about women in politics: Republicans are the oppressors, Democrats are the saviors.
But Usha Vance destroys that narrative simply by existing.
She’s an immigrant’s daughter who excelled in the most elite institutions in the country — and she still believes in secure borders. She’s a successful professional who supports her husband’s conservative vision. She’s a person of color who rejects identity politics.
In other words, she’s living proof that you can achieve everything progressives claim to champion without buying into their ideology.
That drives them insane.
Psaki’s Desperation and Projection
When Psaki sneered about Usha being a “Stepford wife,” what she was really doing was projecting.
The Democratic Party — and its media ecosystem — has become a hive mind of uniformity. The women who thrive within it are the real Stepford wives: perfectly programmed to repeat the same talking points, praise the same leaders, and recite the same mantras about “equity” and “inclusion.”
They march in ideological lockstep while mocking conservative women as brainwashed.
Meanwhile, Usha Vance is living proof that you can be independent-minded, traditional, and successful — without parroting progressive dogma.
That’s the kind of independence Psaki can’t stand, because it exposes her own lack of authenticity.
The Jill Biden Comparison
In perhaps the most ridiculous part of the interview, Psaki tried to compare Usha Vance to Jill Biden, suggesting that the two represent “contrasting models” of political spouses.
That’s laughable.
Jill Biden, who insists on being called “Dr. Jill” for holding a Ph.D. in education, has spent decades riding on her husband’s coattails — from the Senate to the White House — while overseeing an administration collapsing under its own incompetence.
Usha Vance, by contrast, was shaping constitutional law at the Supreme Court level while Jill Biden was handing out community-college syllabi. One woman earned her stature through hard work and intellect; the other through political proximity.
No wonder Psaki prefers the latter.
A Panic Move by the Left
Make no mistake: Psaki’s outburst isn’t random. It’s part of a coordinated attempt to soften the ground for 2028.
Everyone in Washington knows what’s coming — a J.D. Vance presidential campaign. He’s young, disciplined, and politically savvy. His favorability numbers are climbing. His debates have been decisive. And with Donald Trump openly signaling that Vance represents the next generation of America First leadership, Democrats are terrified.
They know they can’t attack Vance on policy — he’s too sharp for that. So they’re attacking his character, his family, his masculinity.
It’s the oldest trick in the book: if you can’t beat the message, smear the messenger.
Jen Psaki’s smear tells you everything you need to know about the state of the Democratic Party in 2025. They’re out of ideas, out of talent, and running on fumes of bitterness and identity politics.
Instead of building a vision for the future, they’re obsessing over the families of their opponents. Instead of debating issues, they’re gossiping about marriages.
Usha and J.D. Vance don’t just represent a political threat — they represent a cultural one. They embody everything the left has spent decades trying to dismantle: faith, family, discipline, and patriotism.
And that’s exactly why the attacks are going to get worse.
The Smear Campaign Behind the Curtain
To understand Jen Psaki’s bizarre comments about Usha Vance, you have to look at the bigger picture. This wasn’t a slip of the tongue or an off-handed remark from a washed-up pundit. It was calculated — part of a broader media effort to chip away at the credibility of Vice President J.D. Vance before 2028 even begins.
For weeks, left-leaning outlets have been quietly circulating “human-interest” pieces that sound more like early-stage opposition research than journalism. You’ve probably seen the headlines:
“Who is Usha Vance, the Quiet Power Behind the Vice President?” or
“Inside the Private Marriage of America’s Most Polarizing Couple.”
Every single one follows the same template — praise wrapped in poison. They feign curiosity while planting innuendo: that she’s “overly devoted,” “withdrawn,” or “secretive.” The goal isn’t to inform; it’s to erode public perception before the campaign trail ever begins.
Jen Psaki’s “Stepford wife” remark was simply the bluntest version of what the Democratic-media complex has been whispering for months.
The Real Fear: A Unified, Popular Couple
The left’s obsession with tearing down the Vances isn’t about gossip — it’s about fear.
Because for the first time in a long time, the Republican Party has a ticket that terrifies the establishment. J.D. Vance and his wife are young, articulate, and genuinely relatable. They’re not career politicians, not legacy elites, not scandal-ridden dynasts. They’re the kind of couple who make ordinary Americans think, “That could be us.”
And that’s a problem for the Democrats.
Their coalition thrives on division and resentment. They sell victimhood as virtue and dependency as compassion. A couple like the Vances — who embody family stability, cultural confidence, and upward mobility — shatters that narrative. They represent the very thing progressivism insists can’t exist: the American dream still alive and well.
The War on Masculinity and Family Values
What really enrages the left about J.D. Vance isn’t his politics — it’s his masculinity.
He’s unapologetically confident, traditional, and strong. He doesn’t apologize for his faith, his family, or his patriotism. He believes in fatherhood, discipline, and national pride — words that send today’s liberal commentariat into full panic mode.
That’s why figures like Psaki have resorted to labeling his wife a “Stepford wife.” It’s an indirect way of attacking him. The implication is that any man who leads confidently must secretly be controlling or abusive.
It’s the same script they used against every strong conservative before him:
-
They said Ronald Reagan was a “Hollywood puppet.”
-
They called Donald Trump a “dictator in waiting.”
-
Now they’re trying to frame J.D. Vance as a misogynist in a cardigan.
But the formula doesn’t work anymore. The country has changed. Americans are exhausted with the cultural left’s obsession with neutering masculinity and redefining womanhood into perpetual victimhood.
J.D. and Usha Vance represent an alternative — one where men lead with conviction and women thrive as equals, not adversaries.
Usha’s Quiet Power
If Psaki had spent five minutes researching before opening her mouth, she’d know that Usha Vance isn’t a silent spouse. She’s an intellectual force behind many of her husband’s policy initiatives.
Colleagues describe her as “methodical, pragmatic, and brutally logical.” She has advised on judicial nominations, national education reform, and ethics standards — not because she craves power, but because she understands the stakes.
In Washington, insiders whisper that Usha is to J.D. what Abigail Adams was to John — a moral compass, a steadying voice, and a sounding board with a razor-sharp intellect.
Far from being a “Stepford wife,” she’s the embodiment of what a modern conservative woman looks like: ambitious yet grounded, accomplished yet family-oriented. She’s proof that feminism’s promise — that women can “have it all” — is not only achievable, but sustainable without discarding tradition.
That’s what Psaki and her crowd can’t stand. Because if women like Usha thrive, their entire ideological business model collapses.
The Identity Politics Dilemma
Another reason the left can’t process Usha Vance is that she doesn’t fit their identity hierarchy.
She’s a woman of color — the daughter of Indian immigrants — who openly supports border security, merit-based immigration, and the sanctity of faith and family. According to progressive orthodoxy, that combination isn’t supposed to exist.
To the Democrats, immigrants are supposed to vote Democrat. Minorities are supposed to believe they’re victims. Women are supposed to resent men.
Usha Vance doesn’t just reject that script — she burns it.
Her success story exposes the lie that America is systemically oppressive. Her marriage to J.D. Vance proves that love, faith, and shared values matter more than political tribes. And her quiet dignity stands in stark contrast to the shrill activism of the self-appointed “resisters.”
Every time she steps into the public eye, she dismantles decades of progressive myth-making.
Media Gaslighting 101
Notice how the media frames every conservative woman the same way.
Melania Trump was “aloof.”
Casey DeSantis was “calculating.”
Now Usha Vance is “robotic.”
It’s not journalism — it’s character assassination disguised as commentary.
The formula is simple: dehumanize the woman, question the marriage, and insinuate dysfunction. That way, the left can attack without appearing sexist. It’s an old trick, and Psaki just gave it a fresh coat of paint.
What’s particularly ironic is that these same pundits will rush to call any criticism of Jill Biden, Kamala Harris, or Michelle Obama “misogyny.” But when the target is a conservative woman, the rules suddenly change.
The hypocrisy is staggering — but predictable.
The Left’s Cultural Fragility
What we’re witnessing isn’t just political nastiness. It’s ideological panic.
The left senses that its cultural dominance is slipping. Americans are tuning out the moral lectures and turning back to common sense. Patriotism is rising among young families. Faith attendance is ticking up after decades of decline. Even formerly blue-collar Democrats are switching parties in record numbers.
The Democrats’ reaction to all of this? Smear campaigns, identity warfare, and fearmongering.
They can’t compete with results, so they try to destroy reputations. They can’t win on policy, so they wage culture wars. And they can’t sell optimism, so they sell outrage.
Jen Psaki’s outburst wasn’t just an unhinged comment — it was a symptom of a dying ideology gasping for relevance.
2028: The Battle They’re Already Preparing For
Behind the scenes, Democratic strategists are terrified of the political map in 2028.
Trump’s popularity within the GOP remains sky-high. The economy, immigration, and foreign policy crises have shattered faith in progressive governance. And J.D. Vance, with his blend of working-class authenticity and academic intellect, has become the bridge between Trump’s populism and the next generation of conservatism.
If the Vances continue on their current trajectory — disciplined, scandal-free, and grounded — the Democrats have no obvious counterweight.
Kamala Harris is politically radioactive. Gavin Newsom is losing credibility outside California. Pete Buttigieg remains a walking punchline.
That leaves the party scrambling for something — anything — to undermine the Vance brand early. And that’s where Psaki and her podcasting peers come in: trial-balloon smear artists. They test narratives to see what sticks before the big election machine deploys them nationwide.
This isn’t random gossip. It’s strategy.
The Power of Example
In their desperation to vilify, Democrats have forgotten the one truth that always outlasts propaganda: example is stronger than narrative.
Americans don’t need talking heads to tell them who the Vances are. They can see it. They can see a couple who built their lives on love, work, and faith — not connections or ideology. They can see parents raising their children with discipline, not indulgence. They can see a family that actually looks like the America most people live in, not the social-media fantasy world of coastal elites.
That authenticity is political dynamite. It’s what fueled Trump’s first rise. It’s what Reagan had in 1980. And it’s what terrifies the permanent political class more than any campaign slogan ever could.
What This Says About Jen Psaki
At the end of the day, Psaki’s remarks reveal more about her than about the Vances.
She’s the embodiment of the D.C. echo chamber — a person so trapped in the bubble of partisan snark that she can’t recognize genuine character when she sees it. Her worldview requires cynicism; she has to believe every conservative family is secretly miserable, every Republican marriage is performative, every display of faith is fake.
Because if she ever admitted that people like J.D. and Usha Vance are happy, sincere, and fulfilled, she’d have to confront the possibility that everything she’s built her career on — the progressive narrative of oppression and resentment — is a lie.
And that’s something Jen Psaki, the self-appointed queen of spin, simply cannot do.
The Lesson the Left Refuses to Learn
Every time the media attacks a conservative woman, it backfires.
It happened with Sarah Palin. It happened with Melania Trump. It’s happening again with Usha Vance. Each time, the smear attempts only highlight the left’s insecurity and the right’s growing cultural momentum.
Americans are tired of hypocrisy. They’re tired of elites mocking normal families while defending dysfunction as progress. They’re tired of moral relativism dressed up as virtue.
What the Vances represent — faith, competence, and love of country — is exactly what millions of Americans are longing to see in leadership again. And no amount of podcast snark or Beltway gossip is going to change that.
Final Thoughts: Why This Matters
Jen Psaki’s latest tirade may seem trivial — just another tone-deaf pundit trying to stay relevant. But it’s symbolic of something much larger.
It’s proof that the Democratic Party’s cultural gatekeepers are losing control of the narrative. Their monopoly on defining what it means to be “modern,” “moral,” or “feminist” is collapsing.
Usha and J.D. Vance are living proof that strength, intelligence, and family values aren’t relics of the past — they’re the foundation of the future.
That’s what terrifies the left. Because if Americans once again start admiring leaders who love their families, respect their faith, and serve their country with humility, the entire progressive experiment begins to crumble.
So let them sneer. Let Psaki talk. Let the podcasts mock. Every insult only reinforces the contrast — between those who talk about empowerment, and those who live it.
Adrian Hawthorne is a celebrated author and dedicated archivist who finds inspiration in the hidden stories of the past. Educated at Oxford, he now works at the National Archives, where preserving history fuels his evocative writing. Balancing archival precision with creative storytelling, Adrian founded the Hawthorne Institute of Literary Arts to mentor emerging writers and honor the timeless art of narrative.