Two months after the tragic killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, commentator Candace Owens has reignited controversy with an extraordinary claim: that Kirk’s death was no ordinary assassination, and that new evidence will “change everything.”
Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and one of the most visible voices in right-wing youth politics, was shot and killed on September 10 at Utah Valley University during the opening leg of his American Comeback Tour. The shooting, which occurred minutes into a campus debate, left a stunned audience of students, donors, and staff scrambling for safety.
Police quickly arrested Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old from Provo, Utah, who was later charged with first-degree murder. Authorities described the attack as an isolated act carried out by a disturbed individual. Yet, despite the formal charges, Owens has continued to insist that a far darker story lies beneath the surface.
On November 17, she told her 9 million followers on X (formerly Twitter):
“Today is going to be a big day. What we will present in the Charlie Kirk investigation is going to change everything. That is not an exaggeration. Nothing will be the same.”
The post set conservative media alight. Within hours, speculation surged that Owens planned to unveil explosive new information on her podcast. She soon delivered—introducing what she described as “irrefutable proof” that Turning Point USA itself knew more about the assassination than it had admitted.
The Context: A Movement in Mourning
Kirk’s death was a devastating blow to the conservative grassroots movement he helped build. Since founding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) in 2012, he had transformed the organization from a college start-up into a national network boasting millions of followers, lavish conferences, and direct access to Republican power brokers.
Kirk’s charisma and fiery rhetoric made him both beloved and polarizing. To supporters, he was a truth-telling patriot willing to challenge liberal orthodoxy; to critics, a divisive provocateur. Either way, he had become a fixture of American political life by his early thirties.
His assassination shocked the country. Footage of the chaotic scene—students screaming, security rushing forward, Kirk collapsing behind a lectern—spread rapidly online. For days, tributes poured in from across the political spectrum. Former President Donald Trump called him “a titan of courage and conviction.”
But as the initial wave of grief subsided, questions began to surface. The shooter’s motive remained unclear. Prosecutors described Robinson as mentally unstable, yet provided little explanation for how he gained access to the heavily secured event. Conspiracy theories flourished in the vacuum, amplified by the decentralized media ecosystem that Kirk himself had helped create.
Owens Steps Into the Spotlight
Enter Candace Owens—one of Kirk’s longtime allies and a frequent collaborator at TPUSA events. Known for her sharp commentary and combative style, Owens had built her own formidable platform as host of The Candace Owens Show and co-founder of the alternative media site Daily Wire Plus.
In the days after Kirk’s death, she was visibly distraught, calling him “a brother in arms.” But soon, her grief turned to suspicion. By late October, she was publicly criticizing investigators for “inconsistencies” in their timeline and accusing the media of “burying key details.”
Then came the November 17 episode of her podcast—an hour-long special she titled “The Truth About Charlie.” It was here that she laid out her most elaborate theory to date.
“A Pregnant Mommy Sleuth” and Egyptian Military Planes
Owens told listeners that a “pregnant mommy sleuth” — a self-described independent researcher — had reached out with a tip her team had overlooked. The woman, Owens said, had tracked two Egyptian military aircraft that repeatedly appeared near Provo Airport, a small regional hub located less than 10 miles from Utah Valley University.
“Between 2022 and September of 2025, both of those aircraft showed 68 overlaps with Erika Kirk’s documented local locations,” Owens said, referring to Charlie’s wife. “I have since been able to add to it now—73 times that this overlapped, okay? And 29 of those instances also happened to include Charlie.”
Owens claimed one of the planes was “turned on” — its transponder briefly activated — on the morning of September 10, and again minutes after the fatal shooting.
“That’s not coincidence,” she declared. “That’s coordination.”
She further alleged that these aircraft had followed Erika Kirk for years, suggesting she might have been “under observation” since 2022. Owens did not provide documentation for the claim but promised to release “flight data” and “security logs” during her next broadcast.
“Charlie Was Right”
In another striking moment, Owens told her audience that Charlie Kirk himself had anticipated betrayal within his own organization.
“Charlie was right,” she said. “He knew I would be the one to defend him after death. He told me that.”
Owens did not elaborate on when or where this conversation allegedly took place, but her insinuation was clear: that Kirk suspected internal forces were plotting against him.
“We find irrefutable proof that Turning Point knows more than they’re telling us,” she said. “Charlie trusted me to tell his story when he couldn’t.”
She promised that forthcoming episodes would “connect the dots” between the aircraft sightings, TPUSA financial records, and what she called “foreign interest in American politics.”
A Firestorm of Reaction
The reaction to Owens’ claims was swift and polarized.
Within hours, mainstream outlets like The New York Times and Reuters labeled her theory “outlandish” and “without credible evidence.” Yet, across conservative social media, the episode exploded—trending under hashtags such as #JusticeForCharlie and #OwensFiles.
Her video topped one million views within 24 hours on X and Rumble. Influencers sympathetic to Owens praised her “courage to ask questions.” Others accused her of exploiting a friend’s tragedy for attention.
Pastor Rob McCoy, who officiated at Kirk’s funeral, issued a rare public rebuke.
“I only wish at this tragic time of mourning she would be the friend to Charlie that he was to her,” McCoy said in an interview with The Independent. “He would never have treated Candace or her family in such a way had, God forbid, this tragedy been hers.”
Neither TPUSA nor Kirk’s family has responded directly to Owens’ new allegations. A Turning Point spokesperson simply said, “We remain focused on honoring Charlie’s legacy and continuing his work.”
Inside the Theory: What Owens Claims to Know
According to Owens’ latest narrative, the pieces form a chilling puzzle.
-
The Planes: Two Egyptian military aircraft allegedly tracked Erika Kirk’s movements across multiple U.S. cities over three years. Owens insists she has geolocation data showing “dozens of overlaps.”
-
The Event: One of those planes was active at Provo Airport the morning of the shooting and again minutes after.
-
The Motive: Owens speculates that foreign interests targeted Kirk because of his outspoken criticism of Middle Eastern governments and his recent remarks about “foreign money infiltrating American politics.”
-
The Cover-Up: She claims Turning Point USA leadership suppressed information about security breaches to protect its donor network and corporate partners.
“If I sound angry, it’s because I am,” she told listeners. “We lost a patriot, and the people closest to him are acting like nothing happened.”
Owens also hinted that whistle-blowers inside TPUSA have begun contacting her anonymously, providing what she described as “screenshots and internal messages” concerning event security.
The Fact Checkers Weigh In
Independent fact-checking organizations moved quickly to assess Owens’ assertions.
Flight Radar 24, a civilian air-traffic monitoring site, found no record of Egyptian military aircraft operating near Provo Airport between 2022 and 2025. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that any foreign military flights in U.S. airspace would require State Department clearance—something that had not been granted.
A former Air Force pilot familiar with international aviation agreements described the claim as “virtually impossible.”
“Military aircraft don’t just drop into Utah without coordination,” said Col. Mark Sutton (ret.). “If two Egyptian planes were there, NORAD would know.”
Still, Owens remains undeterred.
“Do you think they’re going to admit it?” she responded on X. “They lied about everything else.”
The Emotional Undercurrent
For many of Owens’ followers, the conspiracy resonates not because of evidence but because of emotion. Kirk’s death was not just a personal loss—it was a symbolic blow to a movement that often frames itself as under siege by powerful forces.
Owens’ narrative taps into that collective anxiety. By suggesting that Kirk was targeted for “speaking truth to power,” she offers supporters a way to process grief through suspicion rather than acceptance.
Media scholar Dr. Elena Franklin explains:
“Conspiracy theories often emerge after trauma. They give people a sense of control—someone is responsible, there’s a hidden story to uncover. In Owens’ case, the personal relationship with Kirk makes the narrative more compelling to her audience.”
Candace Owens: The Provocateur at the Center
Owens has never shied away from controversy. From her early days as a political commentator, she has challenged mainstream narratives on race, gender, and foreign policy. Her brand is built on boldness—saying what others won’t.
Supporters call her “fearless.” Critics call her “reckless.” Either way, she knows how to command attention.
Her latest claims about Kirk’s death fit a pattern: transforming tragedy into investigation, and investigation into spectacle. The strategy has worked before. Her podcast views have tripled since she launched her “truth series” on Kirk.
Even as sponsors distance themselves, Owens’ audience is growing. Her followers see her as a whistle-blower fighting corruption within her own ranks—a rare position in the tight-knit world of conservative media.
The Cultural Impact: Grief in the Age of Mistrust
The Owens–Kirk saga illustrates a larger phenomenon: the collision between mourning and mistrust in modern America. When public figures die violently, official explanations rarely satisfy. Within hours, alternative stories circulate online, each promising a more dramatic truth.
Sociologist Dr. Hannah Klein notes that the digital era has transformed how communities grieve.
“People don’t just mourn—they investigate,” Klein said. “They crowd-source grief through data mining and speculation. It creates a sense of purpose in the face of loss.”
Owens’ followers see themselves as citizen detectives, scouring flight records, security footage, and unconfirmed tips. To them, her investigation is not a theory—it’s a mission.
Official Silence and the Vacuum It Creates
Neither the FBI, the Utah County Attorney’s Office, nor Turning Point USA has addressed Owens’ specific claims. Their silence, while standard during ongoing proceedings, has only fueled further speculation.
The Egyptian government also declined comment when asked whether any of its military planes had operated in Utah. A spokesperson for Egypt’s Ministry of Defense told LADbible Group that “no such missions are known to our records.”
For Owens, the lack of responses is evidence of a cover-up. For critics, it’s the predictable result of her making unverifiable claims.
The Human Toll
Behind the political drama lies a family still grieving. Erika Kirk, who has kept a low profile since her husband’s death, has not publicly commented on Owens’ statements. Friends say she is focused on raising their young child and continuing Charlie’s charitable work through the Kirk Foundation for Youth Empowerment.
Those close to her worry that Owens’ theories are adding to her pain. One family friend told Politico:
“Every time a new theory goes viral, it forces Erika to relive that day. She’s trying to heal, and the internet won’t let her.”
A Movement Searching for Direction
In the weeks since Kirk’s death, Turning Point USA has struggled to find its footing. Interim leaders are working to keep the organization’s programs afloat, but the loss of its founder has left a vacuum that no one has yet filled.
Owens has positioned herself as Kirk’s defender and heir apparent—roles that some in the organization view as self-serving. Yet, her narrative has galvanized a base that feels leaderless and betrayed.
Political analyst Dr. Peter Langston calls it a “rallying point for disenchantment.”
“Candace Owens has become the voice for a movement that doesn’t trust institutions—not even its own. By casting Kirk as a martyr, she’s transforming a personal tragedy into a political narrative about corruption and truth.”
Adrian Hawthorne is a celebrated author and dedicated archivist who finds inspiration in the hidden stories of the past. Educated at Oxford, he now works at the National Archives, where preserving history fuels his evocative writing. Balancing archival precision with creative storytelling, Adrian founded the Hawthorne Institute of Literary Arts to mentor emerging writers and honor the timeless art of narrative.